<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HOUSTON CRIMINAL DEFENSE &#38; DWI DEFENSE ATTORNEY BLOG &#187; Recent Traffic Law Developments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://colebrookslaw.com/criminaldefense/index.php/category/traffic-tickets/recent-developments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://colebrookslaw.com/criminaldefense</link>
	<description>Published by J. Cole Brooks, Attorney &#38; Counselor At Law, Houston, TX</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:36:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Texas DPS Approves New Surcharge Programs</title>
		<link>http://colebrookslaw.com/criminaldefense/2010/10/22/texas-dps-approves-surcharge-programs/</link>
		<comments>http://colebrookslaw.com/criminaldefense/2010/10/22/texas-dps-approves-surcharge-programs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jcole</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DPS Surcharges & Driver Responsibility Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Traffic Law Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DPS Surcharges]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colebrookslaw.com/criminaldefense/?p=213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DPS provided many Texans with some added relief this week by approving new surcharge programs meant to provided amnesty or relief to Texas drivers that have incurred several hundreds or thousands of dollars in surcharges under the DPS Driver Responsibilty Program. Under this program, Texas drivers are subject to incurring surcharges for a number of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DPS provided many Texans with some added relief this week by approving new surcharge programs meant to provided amnesty or relief to Texas drivers that have incurred several hundreds or thousands of dollars in surcharges under the DPS Driver Responsibilty Program.  Under this program, Texas drivers are subject to incurring surcharges for a number of violations included DWI, DUI, driving while license invalid &#8220;DWLI&#8221;, no drivers license, failure to maintain financial responsibility, and been convicted of to many traffic violations (having more than 6 points) within a three-year period of time.  Failure to pay these surcharges results in a suspension of an individuals driver&#8217;s license.  Frankly, many people lack the financial ability to pay these surcharges, and thus have their driver&#8217;s license suspended by DPS.  This of course can led to additional problems for drivers that are arrested/charged with driving while license suspended &#8220;DWLS&#8221;, such as additional court costs, additional suspensions, fines, and potential jail time.  </p>
<p>The new changes in the surcharge program are intended to allow drivers an opportunity to pay off the surcharges at a reduced amount and in some cases rescind the driver&#8217;s license suspension.  There are three different types of programs that were approved by DPS:  amnesty program; indigency program; and the incentive program.  These programs are going to be &#8220;phased-in&#8221; over the next year or so.  More details of the program are provided in the link below.</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/director_staff/public_information/pr102110.pdf">http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/director_staff/public_information/pr102110.pdf</a>       </p>
<div style="float:left;margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;"><a title="Post on Google Buzz" class="google-buzz-button" href="http://www.google.com/buzz/post" data-button-style="small-count" data-url="http://colebrookslaw.com/criminaldefense/2010/10/22/texas-dps-approves-surcharge-programs/"></a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.google.com/buzz/api/button.js"></script></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://colebrookslaw.com/criminaldefense/2010/10/22/texas-dps-approves-surcharge-programs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>192</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Red-Light Cameras Unconstitutional!!!</title>
		<link>http://colebrookslaw.com/criminaldefense/2010/02/23/red-light-cameras-aventura%e2%80%99s-red-light-cameras-are-illegal-judge-said-south-florida-sun-sentinel-com/</link>
		<comments>http://colebrookslaw.com/criminaldefense/2010/02/23/red-light-cameras-aventura%e2%80%99s-red-light-cameras-are-illegal-judge-said-south-florida-sun-sentinel-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jcole</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Traffic Law Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TRAFFIC TICKET DEFENSE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colebrookslaw.com/criminaldefense/2010/02/23/red-light-cameras-aventura%e2%80%99s-red-light-cameras-are-illegal-judge-said-south-florida-sun-sentinel-com/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Red-light cameras: Aventura’s red-light cameras are illegal, judge said &#8211; South Florida Sun-Sentinel.com Posted using ShareThis Above is a link to an article regarding a decision by a Florida judge ruling that red-light cameras are unconstitutional. Hopefully, the same result regarding red-light cameras will take place here in Houston, TX. Houston criminal defense and traffic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href=http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/florida/fl-aventura-red-light-cameras-20100222,0,1774052.story>Red-light cameras: Aventura’s red-light cameras are illegal, judge said &#8211; South Florida Sun-Sentinel.com</a></p>
<p>Posted using <a href="http://sharethis.com">ShareThis</a></p>
<p>Above is a link to an article regarding a decision by a Florida judge ruling that red-light cameras are unconstitutional.  Hopefully, the same result regarding red-light cameras will take place here in Houston, TX.  Houston criminal defense and traffic ticket defense, Paul Kubosh, has started a petition drive in Houston to get the issue of red light cameras placed on the ballot for the upcoming general election.  The public and not government officials would be able to decide either for or against red-light cameras.  Letting the people decide what a noble concept!  Red-light cameras are not about safety, it&#8217;s about cities looking for ways to increase revenues.  They increase revenue by making these offenses civil, instead of criminal.  As any good criminal defense or traffic ticket lawyer knews when you  make an offense civil, an individual no longer has a right to a jury trial or another of the constitutional rights that are afforded a person accused of a criminal offense.  It costs local governments money to conduct jury trials for individuals accused of traffic offenses such as &#8220;running a red light&#8221;.  In addition, the accused individual now has the burden of proof in the civil/administrative hearing.  What this means is that most people are going to held liable for paying the ticket even if the State offers no &#8220;real&#8221; evidence that it was in fact that person who was the violater or that the red-light camera was even working correctly.  Furthermore, cities know that by placing cameras at these intersections, that they can reduce the number of traffic enforcement officers monitoring these intersections.  Once again, saving the city money by reducing costs for traffic enforcement officers pay.  It&#8217;s not about safety, it&#8217;s about money.  Several studies illustate that it&#8217;s not really about safety, so don&#8217;t let the local governments fool you into thinking otherwise.  </p>
<p>The other danger regarding government use of red-light cameras and other similar tactics is the issue of decriminalization.  Red-light cameras are the government&#8217;s first steps in a fight to potentially decriminalize other violations as well and make them civil in nature.  Once again, an individual does not get the same constitutional rights and protections in civil/administrative proceeding that a person would have in a criminal proceeding. </p>
<p>So I ask that you please join the fight here in Houston and sign the petition initiated by Paul Kubosh against red-light cameras and decriminalization.      </p>
<div style="float:left;margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;"><a title="Post on Google Buzz" class="google-buzz-button" href="http://www.google.com/buzz/post" data-button-style="small-count" data-url="http://colebrookslaw.com/criminaldefense/2010/02/23/red-light-cameras-aventura%e2%80%99s-red-light-cameras-are-illegal-judge-said-south-florida-sun-sentinel-com/"></a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.google.com/buzz/api/button.js"></script></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://colebrookslaw.com/criminaldefense/2010/02/23/red-light-cameras-aventura%e2%80%99s-red-light-cameras-are-illegal-judge-said-south-florida-sun-sentinel-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>721</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.802 seconds -->

